Spotlight On... Amy Robinson |
| by Beth Curran |
| |
| A highlight for me at this year’s Provincetown International
Film Festival was meeting producer Amy Robinson, who took part in
the fest for the first time in support of her latest film, GAME 6.
At a panel discussion later in the weekend, Amy generously mentioned
Chlotrudis, interrupting her panel time to invite me to tell those
in attendance more about our group. The response was great, and the
rest of the weekend I was chatted up by several folks interested
to learn more. Turnabout is fair play – in early August I had
the opportunity to have a phone conversation with Amy, in which we
talked more about her upcoming film, her experiences as a film producer,
and her thoughts on all manners of things film-related |
| |
| A Producer’s Life: |
| Amy Robinson has been producing films for over twenty-five years,
with an impressive roster of films that includes AFTER HOURS, RUNNING
ON EMPTY, FOR LOVE OF THE GAME, and FROM HELL– films which,
although ostensibly made within the ‘Hollywood system’,
all beat with a passionate heart more associated with what is thought
of as ‘independent’(and sometimes, with independent-sized
budgets). She got her start in 1978 when she and another actor friend,
Griffin Dunne, decided to drum up on their own the good projects
they weren’t seeing. Out of that turning point came CHILLY
SCENES OF WINTER, and the realization that her talents and strengths
were ideally suited
to production. Plus, “I get to see it all,
from beginning to end, rather than just the blip of it I did as an
actor.” |
| |
|
| I mentioned to her that, looking back at her filmography, it seems
that she enjoys working with new directors, or established directors
trying their hand in a new genre. Was this deliberate on her part? “I’m
driven by material – and good material attracts directors,
regardless of their style. Sam Raimi, for example – I didn’t
think about what he’d done before, I wanted him because he
had such passion for the story. He’s a huge baseball fan, and
he just loved this script. That’s all that mattered to me.” This
was a theme she’d turn to often during our chat - that it was
the script, the story that mattered most, above all, for her. |
| |
| One way in which this came up again was when I asked her what kind
of producer she was, and she laughed at the familiar question. “If
I ever write my memoir, I’m calling it ‘What Do You Do?’” Since
her focus is on the story, her job is probably more in line with
what people think a producer of ‘indies’ does. She looks
for ideas, reads books and scripts, shepherds them through development,
finds the money, the director and other key hires - the whole kit
and caboodle. This is in opposition to more traditional Hollywood
producers, where one producer might only focus on the financing,
or another on story and development. It’s a point of confusion,
and Amy hopes that the Producers Guild can sort out the issue of
endless producer credits, thereby making it more clear who does what.
The way she finally summed up her job was through analogy: “The
director is the Head General on set, but the producer is the Chief
of Staff.” |
| |
| About GAME 6: |
| Starring Michael Keaton, the film takes place during one particular
day in the life of a playwright and lifelong baseball fan: October
25, 1986, the opening of his newest play and Game 6 of the World
Series, which his team is one game away from winning. So why does
it seem to him like his world stands on a precipice of chaos and
despair? |
|
| Having seen and enjoyed this film at Provincetown, I took the opportunity
to talk more with Amy about the whys and wherefores behind it, as
well as plans for the film’s future. She was happy to mention
that the film was picked up for distribution, and that she hopes
to have a simultaneous premiere in both New York and Boston sometime
in early spring 2006. I agreed with her sentiment that it was most
likely a good thing for the film that the Red Sox won last year – speaking
for myself, I think that if that hadn’t been the case, some
of the film’s later scenes would have been just unbearable. |
| |
| Keaton is freaky good at playing a Sox fan – in fact, the
film is a tour de force for the actor, being more a glimpse into
the mind of a guy facing down a midlife crisis than a sports flick.
Amy’s phrase was “a thinking man’s guy’s
movie,” and she elaborated that it was about superstitions,
hope & depression and the nexus where they meet, and the small
things (a baseball game, a bad review) that can hurt or cripple a
psyche, becoming iconic moments for good or bad in a person’s
life. Clearly, this is not another FEVER PITCH; instead I think GAME
6 touches upon the deeper emotions attached to and stirred by baseball
and its fans – why and how it’s important in the lives
of some to ‘root root root for the home team’. |
| |
| The Film Industry– Today and the Future |
| Our continuing talk about Amy’s thoughts for bringing GAME
6 to the screen provided the natural segue to talk in more general
terms about the state of theatrical distribution today. This had
been a lively topic in Provincetown during Amy’s panel discussion
(co-panelist Christine Vachon went so far to say that for her purposes, “theatrical
is already dead”), and it is one that Chlotrudis members often
commiserate over. Why aren’t there better means to get good
films to the audiences that want them? |
| |
| Amy’s point was that, from the most mainstream of Hollywood
standpoints, wide distribution means tapping the young male demographic.
And that demographic nowadays is more than happy to focus on X-Boxes
and computer downloads instead of going to films – and those
areas of competition are only getting stronger. So, from that perspective,
the industry is in a slump. Meanwhile, everyone else is turning to
their home theatres, OnDemand and Netflix to see the films they aren’t
getting at the multiplex. Amy thinks “With all of this, the
real question should be, is this the end of theatregoing?” |
| |
| Amy doesn’t think that it is – she believes that there’s
something primal about seeing a film with other people, where “you
can’t just pause it and get something from the refrigerator”,
an experience in which “you have to surrender, almost, to what’s
happening.” She sees the potential for a silver lining, in
that theatres might focus on this other (older) demographic and ways
to draw them out. She mentioned as examples Robert Redford’s
attempts to broaden his Sundance vision into a theatre chain, and
also talked about some bigger multiplex chains designating one theatre
as the ‘indie screen’. |
| |
| Amy wondered aloud about how things might shake out, feeling at
times that her generation of filmmakers was the last to start out
as fans of film when movie news was not followed so closely by a
celebrity-fueled media such as Entertainment Weekly, Extra, or E!Online.
Nowadays, when people can see the box office results on TV, scrolling
at the bottom of CNN, she commented about how much more difficult
it is for film audiences to have a pure film experience – watching
a movie ‘fresh’, in a sense. Yet she still believes that
there is a significant portion of the audience out there who do still
want to experience that, but don’t know where or how to get
it. |
| |
| Where Chlotrudis Fits In |
| I mentioned to Amy how, after meeting her in Provincetown, Michael
was struck by how quickly she had gotten what it was that Chlotrudis
does. I asked her, what advice did she have for us, or what might
she suggest to us as a next step to consider? She thought we already
had a great online profile with our website, and was particularly
interested when I told her that we were going to be adding a blog
to the picture, as well. She thinks a key strength of the internet
is that it allows anyone to help spread the word about films, or
to continue and deepen conversation about film in general. The obvious
next step connection in her mind would be to build associations or
relationships with one or more small distributors, whether it be
by linking to their trailers, or cross-promoting their films on the
website as they mention the group on theirs – although she
also noted that this could bring its own headache, by making groups
such as Chlotrudis less independent. |
| |
| Amy commented, though, that it’s hard to say what the landscape
will look like in a few year’s time, with the industry (both
mainstream and independent) in flux about how best to proceed in
the areas of marketing and distribution. Whatever happens, her focus
as always is on discovering, developing and producing great stories,
and then finding the audiences who want to see them – one film
at a time. I for one am going to keep an eye on whatever comes up
next from Amy Robinson. |
| |
| My thanks to Amy for taking time to speak with me. Check the Chlotrudis
website in the coming months for more information about the Boston
premiere of GAME 6. |
| |
|